Bit of a tangent since I'm mostly off-grid on the boat, but I watched this happen to my sister in Leeds. She got a smart meter fitted and within three months her direct debit jumped — supplier claimed it was "more accurate readings" replacing years of underestimates. Convenient timing, that.
The thing that bothers me technically is the In-Home Display units. They show consumption in near real-time which should help people reduce usage, but the research I've seen suggests most households stop checking them after about six weeks. So you've got this data-rich device that just becomes a paperweight next to the kettle.
From my own setup — Victron BMV on the battery bank, solar in/out tracked properly — I can tell you that actually seeing your numbers changes behaviour dramatically. But you have to stay engaged with it. That's the bit smart meters seem to fail on.
There's also the SMETS1 vs SMETS2 issue that caused loads of people grief when switching suppliers — meters going "dumb" and estimated billing resuming anyway, which rather defeats the purpose.
Curious whether anyone here runs a hybrid setup, still grid-tied but with their own monitoring layered on top? I wonder if having your own Victron or similar dashboard running alongside the smart meter gives you a proper sanity check on what the supplier's actually recording.
Has anyone caught a discrepancy between their own metering and what the supplier's system reported?