Bit of a familiar-sounding situation here — wanted to share my own experience because I've seen this pattern crop up a few times with rack-mount LiFePO4 systems.
When I first commissioned my setup (three cells in a bank, similar topology to the PYTES units), the inverter-charger refused to wake up and the battery voltage was reading nonsense — well below what it should have been. Turned out the BMS on each unit hadn't been properly "woken" before connecting everything up. These rack batteries often ship in a deep sleep/storage mode to prevent self-discharge during transit, and until you send them the correct wake signal (usually a brief charge pulse or pressing the activation button on the unit itself), the BMS keeps the output FETs open. Hence the low voltage reading — you're essentially seeing bleed-through rather than actual pack voltage.
Things I'd check in this situation:
- Are all three PYTES units individually activated? Each one needs waking independently before paralleling
- Check the communication cables between the batteries and the EasySolar — if the BMS-to-inverter comms aren't established, Victron kit can refuse to engage
- Verify your DC cabling polarity and that the main fuse/breaker on the battery side is actually closed
- Solar voltage being present at the panels means very little if the MPPT hasn't got a live battery to charge into — it'll just sit there doing nothing
The Victron ESS documentation is actually quite good on pre-commissioning checks. Worth downloading the EasySolar-II GX manual and going through the BMS assistant setup step by step before assuming there's a hardware fault.
Anyone else dealt with PYTES wake-up issues specifically? Curious whether the newer firmware has improved the automatic wake behaviour.