Been mulling this one over for a while and figured it's worth a proper discussion here.
Running a Victron Multiplus 24/3000/70 in my converted Luton van, and whilst my situation differs from a liveaboard, the underlying question is the same — when does it actually make sense to bypass the AC output entirely and wire certain loads direct to shore power, rather than routing everything through the inverter/charger?
My thinking is around efficiency losses. The Multiplus in passthrough mode is impressively transparent, but you're still pushing power through transformers and electronics that weren't designed to run 24/7 indefinitely. For loads that are always on shore power anyway — think a battery charger for tools, or a static electric heater when moored up — routing them direct seems logical.
The counter-argument I keep coming back to is protection and monitoring. The Multiplus gives you RCD protection, surge filtering, and everything feeds into VRM for logging. Split that topology and you lose visibility over part of your system.
A few things worth discussing:
- Does anyone run a dual-bus AC setup — one through the Multiplus, one direct — on a UK installation?
- What are the implications under Part P if you're doing this on a static setup (canal boat, static caravan, etc.)?
- Has anyone had issues with their Fogstar or Pylontech battery bank tolerating the kind of continuous charge/discharge cycling that passthrough loads can create?
Would be especially interested to hear from anyone on a narrowboat or barge who's navigated the marina shore power situation — UK marinas seem wildly inconsistent on supply quality, which changes the calculus somewhat.