Been doing some deliberate grid-loss testing on my Victron Quattro setup after reading about the grid instability incidents on the continent recently. Got me thinking — how robust is my own ESS configuration when things go partially wrong rather than completely wrong?
Here's what I've found, and I'd be curious whether others have replicated this:
Full grid loss (all phases drop simultaneously) — the Quattro handles the transition cleanly. UPS-style switchover, barely a blip on the critical loads.
Partial phase loss — specifically where L1 stays present but L2/L3 drop — this is where it gets messy. The system seems confused about whether it's actually in a grid-loss condition. My understanding is that ESS uses L1 as its primary reference for grid presence detection, so if L1 remains energised the inverter doesn't fully commit to islanded operation. Result: the loads on the dropped phases aren't picked up properly, and I'm seeing some odd behaviour from the MPPT controllers as well.
My workaround currently is to set the AC input current limit aggressively low on L1 during testing, which forces the ESS into a different operating mode, but that's a hack rather than a solution.
Has anyone properly configured the grid code settings or adjusted the phase compensation parameters in VEConfigure to address this? I'm running firmware 498 on the Quattro and using a Cerbo GX.
Also wondering whether a neutral contactor arrangement might be the cleaner engineering solution here — physically isolating when partial phase conditions are detected.
Anyone in the UK had real-world partial phase loss events rather than just test scenarios? Particularly interested if you're on a rural single-phase DNO supply that occasionally does weird things.