Did the same dilemma on a stone bothy in Perthshire a few years back before I converted my van full-time. The temptation is always to skip the floor because it feels like the least glamorous job — but honestly, it was the single biggest difference we noticed.
Stone floors lose heat to the ground constantly, especially in Scotland where the ground stays cold well into summer. We laid 100mm PIR board under a floating timber deck and the place transformed. Previously you'd get your walls and roof properly sorted and still wonder why it felt cold and clammy — that's the floor robbing you.
The other thing nobody mentions is vapour control. Old stone walls need to breathe or you'll get interstitial condensation and a mould nightmare within two seasons. Don't just slap Celotex directly against the stonework. Batten it out, leave an air gap, use something like wood fibre board instead if you want to be sympathetic to the building.
My rough priority order would be:
- Floor (biggest gain per pound)
- Roof/ceiling (heat rises, obvious)
- Walls (do it right or don't bother)
What's the current state of it? Is there already a timber floor, or are you working with bare stone/earth? That changes the approach quite a bit. Also worth knowing if it's listed or in a conservation area — that can rule out certain materials immediately.
Anyone else tackled a traditional Scottish or Welsh stone building? Curious whether others found the breathable approach worth the extra cost versus standard PIR.