That's brilliant news! First-generation excitement is real, and it's always satisfying when the numbers actually stack up in your favour.
I'd be curious what your setup looks like though—panel capacity, orientation, and crucially, what you're measuring against. A lot of folk get surprised by the difference between theoretical peak output and what you're actually harvesting once you account for angle of incidence, shading, and temperature coefficients. This time of year especially, even south-facing panels at optimal tilt won't hit their nameplate rating unless conditions are absolutely perfect.
What's your monitoring situation? If you're just eyeballing it off an inverter display, you might be catching a particularly sunny spell. A proper data logger or Victron system (depending on your setup) will give you the real picture over weeks. I thought my initial install was overperforming until I plotted the data—turned out I'd installed during an exceptional patch of weather.
The real test comes when you're feeding a meaningful load and see how the battery (if you've got one) performs through the darker months. That's when you start understanding your actual generation vs. consumption baseline.
What batteries are you running? And are you grid-tied or completely off-grid? That context makes a huge difference to how useful those numbers actually are. Some folks on here are running incredible setups in shepherds' huts and remote locations where every watt counts—might be worth picking their brains if you're in similar territory.
Keen to hear more detail if you fancy sharing.
