Multiplus AC Input Control Only has Mains Cut In at a SOC Value, No SOC Disconnect?

by Vivaro Wanderer · 3 days ago 14 views 4 replies
Vivaro Wanderer
Vivaro Wanderer
Active Member
37 posts
thumb_up 12 likes
Joined Jun 2023
3 days ago
#20603

Been scratching my head over this one for a while now with my Multiplus-II setup.

When configuring AC Input Control in VEConfigure, you can set the mains to cut in based on SOC — brilliant. But when it comes to the disconnect threshold, you're limited to voltage only. No SOC option. Anyone else find this oddly asymmetrical?

My suspicion is it's a deliberate safety choice on Victron's part. Voltage is a near-instantaneous measurement, so under heavy load your battery voltage can sag significantly below the "true" SOC level. If disconnect were SOC-driven, there's a risk of over-discharging before the BMS even gets a chance to intervene — particularly with older lead-acid banks where SOC estimation is less reliable anyway.

That said, I'm running Fogstar Drift LiFePO4 with a proper Victron-compatible BMS feeding accurate SOC data over VE.Can. In that scenario, SOC-based disconnect feels like it should be trustworthy enough.

The workaround I've landed on is setting a fairly conservative voltage disconnect threshold — accounting for load-induced sag — combined with an ESS assistant rule in Node-RED that monitors SOC and adjusts the input current limit dynamically. Not elegant, but it works.

Has anyone managed a cleaner solution? Particularly curious whether anyone's used DVCC settings or Grid Setpoint tuning to effectively mimic SOC-based disconnect behaviour without going full Node-RED rabbit hole.

Would love to know if this is something Victron have addressed in newer firmware — I'm on v497 currently. Worth raising on the Victron Community forum directly, or has someone already done that?

Copper Welder
Copper Welder
Active Member
31 posts
thumb_up 24 likes
Joined Mar 2024
2 days ago
#20637

@VivaroWanderer — ah yes, the classic "one-armed bandit" problem with AC Input Control. You've spotted something that caught me out too when I was setting up the shepherd's hut system.

The disconnect side is handled differently — you need to set your "Shore power disconnect" via the Scheduled Charging or, more usefully, through ESS Assistant if you're running that. Without ESS, Victron's logic is essentially: mains cuts in at your SOC threshold, then charges to absorption/float, and disconnects naturally when the battery is satisfied.

There's no symmetrical "cut out at X% SOC" in plain AC Input Control — it's charge-completion driven, not SOC-threshold driven on the way out.

If you want proper bidirectional SOC control without ESS, a Generator Assistant (even without an actual generator) can give you more granular cut-in and cut-out SOC values.

LH_Marine
LH_Marine
Regular
70 posts
thumb_up 84 likes
Joined May 2023
2 days ago
#20641

@VivaroWanderer the disconnect side is handled by the ignore AC input signal, not AC Input Control itself. You need to use an Assistant in VEConfigure — specifically the "AC Input current limiter" or more usefully the "Generator start/stop" assistant logic, or wire it through a Venus OS automation rule if you're running a GX device.

On my narrowboat setup I use a Cerbo GX with a Node-RED flow: mains cuts in at 50% SOC, ignores AC (effectively disconnecting) at 80%. Clean and flexible.

Alternatively, the Multiplus "Ignore AC" input pin on the control connector can be driven by a relay triggered from a BMV-712 relay output — dead simple, no GX required.

The short answer: AC Input Control was never designed to be bidirectional on SOC alone. You need a second mechanism for the upper threshold.

Ray Watson
Ray Watson
Active Member
38 posts
thumb_up 45 likes
Joined Nov 2023
2 days ago
#20682

@VivaroWanderer the missing piece is the Assistants tab in VEConfigure. Stack a Generator start/stop assistant (works for mains too) alongside AC Input Control — you can set both a cut-in and a disconnect SOC there. The two work together rather than one replacing the other.

Alternatively, if you've got a GX device (Cerbo, CCGX etc.), the ESS assistant handles this far more elegantly with proper charge/discharge SOC thresholds baked in. That's the route I went on my cabin setup running a Multiplus-II with Fogstar Drift cells — far less faffing about in VEConfigure.

@LH_Marine is right that ignore AC can do it but wiring that up just to manage SOC thresholds feels like overkill when the assistant approach is cleaner.

Devon Dweller
Devon Dweller
Regular
63 posts
thumb_up 28 likes
Joined Mar 2024
10 hours ago
#20893

@RayWatson81 has the right idea, but worth being precise: the Generator Start/Stop assistant controls the relay output, not AC input directly. You need the AC Input Current Control assistant paired with it, or — more elegantly — use the ESS assistant if your setup qualifies, as ESS handles both cut-in and disconnect thresholds natively through a single SOC window (minimum SOC + reconnect offset).

If ESS isn't appropriate (boat or caravan without grid feedback), the cleanest non-ESS solution is stacking the Ignore AC Input assistant with hysteresis values set manually. On my narrowboat setup I run exactly this — mains cuts in at 20% SOC, disconnects again at 80%. VEConfigure lets you define both thresholds independently within that assistant.

Victron's own KB article "AC Input control explained" covers this clearly if you want the official reference.

Log in to join the discussion.

Log In to Reply