Bit of a curious one this, and I'd love to know if others have hit the same wall.
On my narrowboat setup I'm running a Victron Multiplus-II with a Cerbo GX and DESS trying to do its clever thing with time-of-use tariffs. The solar panels feed in through a separate MPPT, and I've got it configured to throttle generation when export prices go negative — which makes perfect sense on paper.
The odd behaviour I keep noticing though: when the system dims the solar output to avoid negative-price export, DESS seems quite happy to pull from the grid at a higher rate rather than just... letting the panels do their job and deliver a small amount back at a modest positive price. It's almost like the algorithm gets tunnel vision about avoiding export without properly weighing up the cost of the alternative.
Has anyone else found DESS making decisions that look logical in isolation but fall apart when you look at the whole picture? I'm wondering whether it's a node configuration issue on my end, or whether the integration between dimming commands and the DESS cost optimisation genuinely doesn't account for this edge case properly.
I've had a poke around the Victron Community forums and found a few threads dancing around this, but nothing that nails it.
A few questions worth chewing on:
- Is this a known limitation of DESS in the UK market?
- Does the SolarEdge integration handle this better with a dedicated inverter versus MPPT?
- Anyone found ESS assistant settings that help DESS make smarter trade-offs here?
Genuinely curious what setups people are running and whether there's a workaround.