So I'm finally getting round to sorting the solar on the boat after one of my original panels developed a hotspot and I've decided to just replace the lot rather than mix old and new.
Currently running two Victron SmartSolar 100/30 controllers, which I'm keeping. The old setup was eight 100W panels — four per controller, wired in a 2S2P arrangement. Worked fine for a few years but the panels were cheap Renogy units and one's now toast.
I'm looking at going to four 200W panels (probably Risen or similar) to keep costs sensible. That's only two panels per controller, which is where my head starts to ache a bit.
My options as I see them:
- 2S per controller — doubles the voltage, keeps current manageable, but I lose the parallel redundancy
- 2P per controller — keeps voltage lower, doubles the current, but I need to check whether the 30A limit becomes a bottleneck at peak
The 100/30 handles up to 100V input, and the 200W panels I'm eyeing have a Voc around 24V, so 2S would sit comfortably within spec. But on a narrowboat the shading situation is interesting — trees, bridges, locks — so I'm wondering whether series makes shading worse than parallel would.
Has anyone done a similar swap on a boat or smaller off-grid setup? Is there a meaningful real-world difference between the two configs when you're dealing with partial shade throughout the day? Or am I overthinking it and should just wire 2S and get on with life?